When you sign your name,mean it.
Dokeo runs every compliance review as a case. It reads your evidence, holds it against the rulebook, and shows you exactly what you can prove and what you can't. You review what matters, and sign with confidence.
Compliance is the same three jobs, cycle after cycle.
Read the documents. Check them against the rules. Watch for what changed. That judgment is the work, and it should stay yours. What wears the day down is everything around it: re-keying between tools, chasing evidence across inboxes and drives, re-checking what moved since last quarter.
Document analysis
Read and pull what matters from IDs, contracts, policies, model cards, and financial statements.
Manual review
Hold it against the rule set and judge whether the evidence is actually sufficient.
Monitoring
Re-open the case on a cadence and re-check what changed.
Dokeo carries that connective work and brings the evidence together, then hands you the exceptions.
You make the call, with everything in front of you.
One shape across: KYC / AML onboarding · vendor due diligence · audit fieldwork · AI governanceFrom your documents to defensible findings.
Being right isn't enough. You have to be able to show it. Dokeo runs each review as a case, compares your evidence to the rule set you picked, and draws a clear line between what you can claim and what you can't.
Your documents
- Policies & procedures
- Model cards & DPIAs
- Contracts & financials
Ingested and parsed, never re-keyed.
Dokeo reviews
- Framework rulebook
- The Resilience Matrix
- Evidence sufficiency
- Claims & verification
Deterministic rules + Dokeo. Re-checkable by replay.
Defensible findings
- Findings & gaps
- Evidence pack · sourced
- Ask Dokeo · plain English
Every claim sourced to a document.
This evidence supports X. It does not support Y. To claim Y, request Z. The defensible finding is A, not B.
What the evidence proves, and what it can't.
For every finding, Dokeo shows three things: the documents that support it, the claim they don't, and the one request that would close the gap. It never claims what the evidence can't carry.
“Human oversight is defined and assigned.”
- Oversight SOP v2 · §3 roles & escalation
- Escalation runbook · countersigned
“Oversight is continuously exercised in production.”
From hope-based to provable.
- Findings live in fourteen emails, three spreadsheets, and someone’s memory.
- “Looks fine. Probably fine. We’ll find out in the audit.”
- You carry the risk of every gap you couldn’t see.
- One case: evidence and claim in the same place.
- “Supported by Oversight SOP §3. Re-checkable by replay.”
- Bring on the audit.
One engine, every framework.
Each framework is broken down to the article and written once. Then every case follows the same steps, so the proof holds up the same way, whatever you're reviewing.
GenAI Usage Review
GenAI tools you deploy: risk, oversight, transparency.
First published template
EU AI Act
High-risk obligations across Arts 9–17, 43, 49–72 + GPAI.
Conformity, end to end
DORA
Operational resilience for financial entities, EUR-Lex grounded.
6 domains · 35 review items
In the substrate
Conditional obligations wired into the frameworks above.
Same authoring path
For the people who put their name on the work.
Dokeo organises the three repeated jobs and shows where the evidence falls short. You review the exceptions, and stand behind the result.
Every claim supported, or it doesn't ship.
A living baseline, not a point-in-time snapshot.
Article-level proof, re-checkable by replay.
Ask Dokeo, in plain English.
Sign the next one with confidence.
If you lead AI governance, compliance, risk, legal review, or audit readiness, we'll walk you through a live case on your own framework: GenAI Usage Review, EU AI Act, or DORA. No data leaves your review.
Augment the reviewer. Never replace the sign-off.